Report Details

Report Title: litter
Created: 18/12/2013
Category: Waste and Littering - Littering
Reporter:
Country: Australia
Latitude: -27.49
Longitude: 153.06
Risk Rating
Cause: ManMade- Individual (Lee)
Severity: Insignificant
Frequency: Once
Evidence
Photo image/jpeg (2.24 MB)
Video (0.00 B)
Audio (0.00 B)
Description: Coorparoo bowls littering
Views: 1410

Latest Events

  • event tests

    event tests

    Start: October 12, 2013 End: October 12, 2013
    Address: gfddhh, fsthh

  • test event

    test event

    Start: September 19, 2013 End: September 19, 2013
    Address: no address, no town

  • hhh

    hhh

    Start: September 16, 2013 End: September 16, 2013
    Address: jjj, jjj

Latest News

  • Rainforest biodiversity at risk from global warming

    September 24, 2017

    Climbing temperatures may doom many tropical species to extinction if they are unable to migrate to higher elevations or cooler latitudes, report researchers writing in Science.
  • NOAA offers "dramatic evidence" of Arctic warming

    September 24, 2017

    Fall air temperatures 9°F (5°C) above normal, the second lowest-ever extent of summer sea ice, and the melting of surface ice in Greenland are signs of continued warming in the Arctic, according to the Arctic Report Card, an annual review of Arctic conditions by U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and its partners.
  • Geoengineering schemes need ranking system to avoid wasting money, destroying the planet

    September 24, 2017

    Schemes to alter Earth's climate on a planetary scale should be ranked according to their efficacy, cost, risks and their rate of mitigation, argues a new editorial published in Nature Geoscience. With so-called geoengineering proposals proliferating as concerns over climate change mount, Philip Boyd of New Zealand's NIWA warns that "no geo-engineering proposal has been tested or even subjected to preliminary trials". He says that despite widespread media attention, scientists have yet to even come up with a way to rank geoegineering schemes for their efficacy, cost, associated risk, and timeframe. Thus is it unclear whether ideas like carbon burial, geochemical carbon capture, atmospheric carbon capture, ocean fertilization, cloud manipulation, "space sunshades", or strategically-placed pollution can be effective on a time-scale relevant to humankind, economical, or even safe.